Afforestation as a Sustainability Tactic?
Figure 1: The location of the New York City Afforestation Project research plots (Oldfield et al., 2013).
Afforestation projects are commonly carried out on areas that
have been converted from an urban to industrial land. However, the potential of
conducting afforestation on land that has not been previously utilized such as
in New York City opens the topic on soil restoration. The question in research
is if urban soil quality could be improved through site preparation and
management because the soil must be healthy enough to provide the necessary
chemical and biological conditions for growing vegetation. The results
concluded that the question was found to be probable as it improved
infiltration, decomposition, mineralization, and nutrient retention of urban
soil (Oldfield et al., 2014). There was a decrease in bulk density (1.4 to 0.72
g cm-3), a pH decrease in soil acidity (pH 7.36 to 7.04), and
significant increases in microbially-available carbon, biomass, and soil carbon
concentration (Oldfield et al., 2014). This indicated that urban soil may be improving
its quality to perform cycling and transformations of trees. To elaborate, afforestation
can be a key to sustainability because forests can cycle toxic carbon out from
the atmosphere and through photosynthesis, convert it into biomass. Environmental
sustainability focuses on the maintenance of capital in which we protect and
conserve where our natural resource derive from. The trade-off would be that as
we focus on environmental degradation (improving the soil quality from the
impacts of dense, urban areas) and through research gain knowledge of the this topic, we can participate in environmental restoration
that will increase the welfare for humans in the future by reducing the carbon
footprint.
Oldfield, E. E., Felson, A. J., Wood, S.
A., Hallett, R. A., Strickland, M. S., and Bradford, M. A. (2014). Positive
effects of afforestation efforts on the health of urban soils. Forest Ecology
and Management. Elsevier, Inc. 313(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.027
Comments
Post a Comment